19061503

From SEQwiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This reference describes USeq.

PMID PMID 19061503
Title Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
Year 2008
Journal BMC Bioinformatics
Author Nix DA, Courdy SJ, Boucher KM.
Volume 9
Start page 523


Error: No contents found at URL http://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/MED/19061503/citations/4000.

According to Europe PubMed Central, this reference has Error: no local variable "citations" was set. " Error: no local variable "citations" was set. " is not a number. citations.

For reference, you can check Google Scholar, which lacks an API because Google ...


Error: Invalid JSON. According to Almetric, this reference has an Altmetric score of Error: no local variable "altscore" was set. " Error: no local variable "altscore" was set. " is not a number..

Full text description

BACKGROUND: High throughput signature sequencing holds many promises, one of which is the ready identification of in vivo transcription factor binding sites, histone modifications, changes in chromatin structure and patterns of DNA methylation across entire genomes. In these experiments, chromatin immunoprecipitation is used to enrich for particular DNA sequences of interest and signature sequencing is used to map the regions to the genome (ChIP-Seq). Elucidation of these sites of DNA-protein binding/modification are proving instrumental in reconstructing networks of gene regulation and chromatin remodelling that direct development, response to cellular perturbation, and neoplastic transformation. RESULTS: Here we present a package of algorithms and software that makes use of control input data to reduce false positives and estimate confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks. Several different methods were compared using two simulated spike-in datasets. Use of control input data and a normalized difference score were found to more than double the recovery of ChIP-Seq peaks at a 5% false discovery rate (FDR). Moreover, both a binomial p-value/q-value and an empirical FDR were found to predict the true FDR within 2-3 fold and are more reliable estimators of confidence than a global Poisson p-value. These methods were then used to reanalyze Johnson et al.'s neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) ChIP-Seq data without relying on extensive qPCR validated NRSF sites and the presence of NRSF binding motifs for setting thresholds. CONCLUSION: The methods developed and tested here show considerable promise for reducing false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq data without any prior knowledge of the chIP target. They are part of a larger open source package freely available from http://useq.sourceforge.net/.